Prices are £ Sterling and are exclusive of VAT (sales tax)
and inclusive of delivery charges unless otherwise stated.
We reserve the right to alter specification without notice.
WROBLER
WROBLER
A brief description of the technique involved
The main performance features of the 'Wrobler' Waste separator are:
The unit in its basic design separates the following fractions:
Compost
Plastics and paper
Bottle / Cans
It is of course, possible to carry on dividing the final fraction into further sub-fractions, should this be required.
In order to describe the technique involved, and at the same time demonstrate that it works, a scale model (1/3) of the waste separator was
built and subjected to real-life tests with solid waste taken directly
from households.
Comparisons between the composition of the waste and the content of the
various fractions clearly indicate an extremely good sorting result.
Since the structure of the technique is compact and modular, a variety
of sizes, capacity requirements, fractions, etc. can be adapted to suit
the specific demands of individual recycling plants with respect to
separations. Its compact design means that the waste separator can be
built as a mobile unit and moved between temporary sites.
The level of mechanization can be varied - from a mobile design with a
simple inflow and outflow up to a fully automated unit. The waste
separator can serve as the nucleus of a plant which is fully mechanized
and where the different fractions are separated, transported and
stored, in a totally detached and enclosed system, prior to the next
treatment stage.
This brochure shows that the separator is simple in design, which
naturally has a significant effect on investments, operation and
maintenance. The fact that it is possible to build in different levels
of mechanization for a recycling plant means that the plant can be
built in stages.
Similarly, a number of machines can be connected together in a larger
plant, and this is of interest bearing in mind the increasing demands
likely to be made in the future on a recycling plant located in a
developing area.
Some of the advantages offered in comparison with current alternative
technical solutions:
Separates material better than other currently known mechanical
methods. Tests and analyses carried out to date indicate that at least
80% of the compost fraction is sorted into Hopper 1.
Low energy consumption as a result of the fact that the waste is not
crushed into small fractions but is instead cut/shredded into
manageable pieces.
Low investment costs.
Low operation and maintenance costs.
Operationally reliable as a result of its simple structure.
High sorting capacity.
Great flexibility, can be adapted or extended to required
capacities.
